[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110310152201.bb621c3f.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 15:22:01 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Phil Carmody <ext-phil.2.carmody@...ia.com>, gregkh@...e.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 1/1] sysfs: add more info to the oops dump
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 00:13:58 +0100 (CET)
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> > > It's more of an distraction than anything which is relevant to 99.999%
> > > of the problems we have to deal with.
> >
> > As I indicated before, I've previously thought that too, but thought I
> > could 'fix' it by adding to it when I hit the once-in-three-years case.
>
> The interesting question is:
>
> How did that info help and was it really the ultimate reason why you
> found the underlying bug ?
What happens with sysfs is that if a subsystem's handler is buggy, that
tends to cause a crash within sysfs core code. You get a stack trace
which contains only VFS and sysfs functions - there is no symbol in the
trace which permits you to identify the offending subsystem.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists