[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110310052218.GB10574@dumpdata.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 00:22:18 -0500
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@...citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 10/14] xen: events: maintain a list of Xen
interrupts
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 05:41:22PM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> In a PVHVM kernel not all interrupts are Xen interrupts (APIC interrupts can also be present).
>
> Currently we get away with walking over all interrupts because the
> lookup in the irq_info array simply returns IRQT_UNBOUND and we ignore
> it. However this array will be going away in a future patch so we need
> to manually track which interrupts have been allocated by the Xen
> events infrastructure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>
> ---
> drivers/xen/events.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/events.c b/drivers/xen/events.c
> index cf372d4..e119989 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/events.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/events.c
> @@ -56,6 +56,8 @@
> */
> static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(irq_mapping_update_lock);
>
> +static LIST_HEAD(xen_irq_list_head);
> +
> /* IRQ <-> VIRQ mapping. */
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int [NR_VIRQS], virq_to_irq) = {[0 ... NR_VIRQS-1] = -1};
>
> @@ -85,7 +87,9 @@ enum xen_irq_type {
> */
> struct irq_info
> {
> + struct list_head list;
> enum xen_irq_type type; /* type */
> + unsigned irq;
> unsigned short evtchn; /* event channel */
> unsigned short cpu; /* cpu bound */
>
> @@ -135,6 +139,7 @@ static void xen_irq_info_common_init(struct irq_info *info,
> BUG_ON(info->type != IRQT_UNBOUND && info->type != type);
>
> info->type = type;
> + info->irq = irq;
> info->evtchn = evtchn;
> info->cpu = cpu;
>
> @@ -311,10 +316,11 @@ static void init_evtchn_cpu_bindings(void)
> {
> int i;
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> - struct irq_desc *desc;
> + struct irq_info *info;
>
> /* By default all event channels notify CPU#0. */
> - for_each_irq_desc(i, desc) {
> + list_for_each_entry(info, &xen_irq_list_head, list) {
> + struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(info->irq);
> cpumask_copy(desc->irq_data.affinity, cpumask_of(0));
> }
> #endif
> @@ -397,6 +403,21 @@ static void unmask_evtchn(int port)
> put_cpu();
> }
>
> +static void xen_irq_init(unsigned irq)
> +{
> + struct irq_info *info;
> + struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
> +
> + /* By default all event channels notify CPU#0. */
> + cpumask_copy(desc->irq_data.affinity, cpumask_of(0));
> +
> + info = &irq_info[irq];
> +
> + info->type = IRQT_UNBOUND;
> +
> + list_add_tail(&info->list, &xen_irq_list_head);
Should we use some form of spinlock lock? Just in case
there are two drivers that are being unloaded?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists