[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110310053852.GE10574@dumpdata.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 00:38:52 -0500
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@...citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/14] xen: events: propagate irq allocation failure
instead of panicking
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 05:41:26PM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> Running out of IRQs need not be fatal to the machine as a whole.
Do the backends/frontends deal with this appropiately?
>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>
> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
> Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
> ---
> drivers/xen/events.c | 22 ++++++++++++++--------
> 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/events.c b/drivers/xen/events.c
> index 51c6a5b..c6f2a2e 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/events.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/events.c
> @@ -406,7 +406,7 @@ static void xen_irq_init(unsigned irq)
> list_add_tail(&info->list, &xen_irq_list_head);
> }
>
> -static int xen_allocate_irq_dynamic(void)
> +static int __must_check xen_allocate_irq_dynamic(void)
What is the '__must_check' for?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists