[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D79F068.2080009@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 09:50:32 +0000
From: Andy Green <andy@...mcat.com>
To: Linux USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
CC: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RFC: Platform data for onboard USB assets
Hi -
platform_data is a well established way in Linux to pass configuration
data up to on-board assets from a machine file like mach-xyz.c. It's
also supported to pass platform_data up to devices that are probed
asynchronously from busses like i2c as well, which is very handy.
However AFAIK it's not possible to bind platform_data to probed USB
devices as it stands.
There are now boards which have on-board USB assets, for example OMAP4
Panda which has a USB <-> Ethernet bridge wired up permanently. It'd be
convenient to also be able to pass optional platform_data to these
devices when they are asynchronously probed.
So what's the feeling about a new api to register an array of
platform_data pointers bound to static "devpath" names in the machine file?
When a usb device is instantiated, it can check through this array if it
exists, matching on devname, and attach the platform_data to the
underlying probed usb device's dev->platform_data, which it seems is
currently unused.
The particular use that suggested this is on Panda, it would be ideal to
be able to set a flag in the usb device's platform data that forces it
to be named eth%d since it's a hardwired asset on the board with an RJ45
socket.
Comments, implementation suggestions, enquiries as to my level of crack
consumption etc welcomed ^^
-Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists