[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <sched-ipi-callback-comment@mdm.bga.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 09:07:13 -0600
From: Milton Miller <miltonm@....com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...sony.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>,
Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@...s.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [01/22] sched: Provide scheduler_ipi() callback in response to
smp_send_reschedule()
On Wed, 02 Mar 2011 17:38:32 -0000, To: Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> For future rework of try_to_wake_up() we'd like to push part of that
> onto the CPU the task is actually going to run on, in order to do so we
> need a generic callback from the existing scheduler IPI.
>
> This patch introduces such a generic callback: scheduler_ipi() and
> implements it as a NOP.
>
> BenH notes: PowerPC might use this IPI on offline CPUs under rare
> conditions!!
..
> Index: linux-2.6/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> +++ linux-2.6/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ void smp_message_recv(int msg)
> break;
> case PPC_MSG_RESCHEDULE:
> /* we notice need_resched on exit */
This comment should also be removed, as it was documenting the empty action.
> + scheduler_ipi();
> break;
> case PPC_MSG_CALL_FUNC_SINGLE:
> generic_smp_call_function_single_interrupt();
> @@ -127,7 +128,7 @@ static irqreturn_t call_function_action(
>
> static irqreturn_t reschedule_action(int irq, void *data)
> {
> - /* we just need the return path side effect of checking need_resched */
> + scheduler_ipi();
> return IRQ_HANDLED;
> }
>
Thanks,
milton
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists