[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1103111722521.2787@localhost6.localdomain6>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 17:23:36 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
cc: Alexander Shishkin <virtuoso@...nd.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>,
Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
Chris Friesen <chris.friesen@...band.com>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>,
Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: timerfd-add-tfd_notify_clock_set-to-watch-for-clock-changes.patch
added to -mm tree
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > @@ -218,10 +266,12 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(timerfd_settime, int, uf
> > * it to the new values.
> > */
> > for (;;) {
> > + spin_lock(¬ifiers_lock);
> > spin_lock_irq(&ctx->wqh.lock);
> > - if (hrtimer_try_to_cancel(&ctx->tmr) >= 0)
> > + if (!list_empty(¬ifiers_list) || hrtimer_try_to_cancel(&ctx->tmr) >= 0)
> > break;
>
> Confused. Why do we check the global notifiers_list?
>
> IOW. Suppose that this list is not empty and timerfd_settime() is called
> without TFD_NOTIFY_CLOCK_SET. Now we are going to reprogramm the timer
> without stopping it?
>
> And. What if timerfd_settime(TFD_NOTIFY_CLOCK_SET, utmr => NULL) is called
> twice? timerfd_setup() blindly does list_add(), and we corrupt the list, no?
And why is this hack in -mm at all ?
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists