linux-kernel - Re: kernel git bisect question

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4D7A6CDA.4070402@compro.net>
Date:	Fri, 11 Mar 2011 13:41:30 -0500
From:	Mark Hounschell <markh@...pro.net>
To:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
CC:	Linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: kernel git bisect question

On 03/11/2011 01:37 PM, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 01:31:53PM -0500, Mark Hounschell wrote:
>> On 03/10/2011 04:54 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 03:27:00PM -0500, Mark Hounschell wrote:
>>>> Between git bisect [good | bad ]s should I always "make clean" or can I
>>>> count on the build system to take care of everything properly?
>>>
>>
>> I'm trying to bisect between 2.6.35 and 2.6.36. What have I done wrong?
>> Here is exactly what I've done. Why after my second "git bisect bad" do
>> I get a Makefile for 2.6.35-rc1 and then after the fourth I get a Makefile
>> for 2.6.34??
> 
> The development is not linear.
> So you see a commit developed on top of 2.6.34 that was included in 2.6.35.
> This is normal.
> 

OK, thanks again. I'll continue on with the process then.

Mark
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/