[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110311185118.GB1110@tux1.beaverton.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 10:51:18 -0800
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...ibm.com>
To: Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mingming Cao <mcao@...ibm.com>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] block integrity: Fix write after checksum calculation
problem
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 11:34:05AM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
> Excerpts from Darrick J. Wong's message of 2011-03-10 18:57:22 -0500:
> > On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 03:56:26PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 01:07:24PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 07:54:05AM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
> > > > > Excerpts from Darrick J. Wong's message of 2011-02-24 13:27:32 -0500:
> > > > > > On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 12:37:53PM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
> > > > > > > Excerpts from Jan Kara's message of 2011-02-24 11:47:58 -0500:
> > > > > > > > On Wed 23-02-11 15:35:11, Chris Mason wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Excerpts from Joel Becker's message of 2011-02-23 15:24:47 -0500:
> > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 11:45:44AM -0500, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > Also, DIX is only the tip of the iceberg. Many other impending
> > > > > > > > > > > technologies feature checksums and require pages to be stable during I/O
> > > > > > > > > > > due to checksumming, encryption and so on.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > The VM is already trying to do the right thing. We just need the
> > > > > > > > > > > relevant filesystems to catch up.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > ocfs2 handles stable metadata for its checksums when feeding
> > > > > > > > > > things to the journal. If we're doing pagecache-based I/O, is the
> > > > > > > > > > pagecache going to help here for data?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Data is much easier than metadata. All you really need is to wait on
> > > > > > > > > writeback in file_write, wait on writeback in page_mkwrite, and make
> >
> > Hrm... I've been looking for a file_write in ext4; was the aio_write function
> > pointer what you had in mind here?
>
> Your change to grab_cache_page_write_begin looks good to me, at least
> for ext4. For ext3 you have to actually go in and wait for each of the
> buffer heads in the page, since ext3 (and reiserfs) will write the buffer heads
> directly without using writepage.
Heh, I hadn't really given much thought to ext2/3 yet. I'm still trying to
figure out what causes the occasional ext4 failures. :)
> Have you confirmed by looking at the block mapping that your crc errors
> are from data blocks?
Yes, debugfs confirms that they are data blocks.
--D
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists