[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1103112100240.2787@localhost6.localdomain6>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 21:12:13 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
cc: Abhijeet Dharmapurikar <adharmap@...eaurora.org>,
davidb@...eaurora.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Bryan Huntsman <bryanh@...eaurora.org>,
Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com>,
David Collins <collinsd@...eaurora.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Stepan Moskovchenko <stepanm@...eaurora.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...rricsson.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Qualcomm PM8921 MFD v2 2/6] mfd: pm8xxx: Add irq support
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 08:43:08PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> > Sigh, why insist people on working around core code instead of talking
> > to the responsible maintainers about their problem in the first place?
>
> I don't know if it's the case here but with a lot of the people I speak
> to it's because they're used to working on proprietary OSs where there's
> no possibility of fixing the core and they haven't yet realised that
> this is a possibility.
Good point. If I only knew a way to get this message to those folks
once and forever.
There are several good reasons to avoid working around core code:
- It's usually simpler and faster as the core code has all the
necessary information. So that's even an argument which managers
might understand.
- Such workarounds, when not caught, tend to spread themself
magically because driver writers checkout the existing code of
similar devices and copy/paste/modify^Wuglify them over and over.
- In the worst case such workarounds make the core maintainence
harder and in some cases impossible, because they silently imply
semantics on the core w/o the core maintainer knowing about them.
I'm going to give a talk about that at the collab summit :)
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists