[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201103112318.19678.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 23:18:19 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
Cc: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] X86: Revamp reboot behaviour to match Windows more closely
On Friday, March 11, 2011, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 11:08:18PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Friday, March 11, 2011, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > Windows reboots by hitting the ACPI reboot vector (if available), trying
> > > the keyboard controller, hitting the ACPI reboot vector again and then
> > > giving the keyboard controller one last go. Rework our reboot process a
> > > little to default to matching this behaviour, although we'll fall through
> > > to attempting a triple fault if nothing else works.
> >
> > Does this fix a particular problem observed in practice?
>
> Yup. We're seeing an increasing number of machines that don't implement
> the legacy keyboard controller at all and fail to reboot if you poke it.
> The expectation appears to be that you use the ACPI reboot vector on
> these machines.
So perhaps you can put a pointer or two into the changelog? That would
show precisely that it's not just for pure Windows compatibility.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists