linux-kernel - Re: [BUG] Fans keep running, first found since v2.6.38-rc7

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4d7aa9f1.6fc6ec0a.073f.fffffb89@mx.google.com>
Date:	Sat, 12 Mar 2011 07:02:11 +0800
From:	Wang Lei <f3d27b@...il.com>
To:	Andreas Herrmann <herrmann.der.user@...glemail.com>
Cc:	Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	ACPI Devel Mailing List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] Fans keep running, first found since v2.6.38-rc7

Hi Andreas,

With your patch, it looks OK. In case it's useful, attached dmesg and
lspci output.


View attachment "dmesg3" of type "text/plain" (33867 bytes)

View attachment "lspci3" of type "text/plain" (19414 bytes)


Thanks!

On 2011-03-11 22:28:54 +0800, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 08:47:01PM +0800, Wang Lei wrote:
>> 
>> On 2011-03-11 19:38:39 +0800, Andreas wrote:
>> >
>> > Can you please try to boot -rc7 with kernel parameter acpi_skip_timer_override
>> > and send the same output (dmesg again also with apic=debug and lspci -nnxxxx)
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > Andreas
>> >
>> > PS: My assumption is that the patch in -rc7 leads to usage of IO-APIC
>> >     pin2 for timer interrupt (potentially I have broken chipset
>> >     revision determination for some SB600.)
>
>> Hi Andreas,
>> 
>> I did what you said, appended acpi_skip_timer_override when boot -rc7.
>> Now the fans work OK. I don't know why and I don't think this is the
>> final solution. If not, I'll wait.
>
> Ok, the problem is that all SB[6-8]00 chipsets use the same PCI device ID.
> To differntiate the versions I need to check the revision ID.
>
> With my patch I removed some special treatment for SB600.
> (See http://support.amd.com/us/Embedded_TechDocs/46155_sb600_rrg_pub_3.03.pdf)
>
>            Revision ID/Class Code- R - 32 bits - [PCI_Reg: 08h]
> Field Name   Bits      Default                             Description
> RevisionID    7:0     11h /      This field reflects the ASIC revision.
>                       12h /      11h : For ASIC revision A11
>                       13h        12h : For ASIC revision A12
>                                  13h : For ASIC revision A13
>                                  For ASIC revisions after A13, by default this field will read 13h
>                                  still. However, if SMBUS PCI config 70h bit 8 is set to 1, a
>                                  hidden revision ID can be read from this field.
>
> The old code temporarily cleared bit 8 in PCI config 70h and received
> 13h as revision for device 14.0 on your system (the "hidden revision
> ID" shown in your lspci output is 0x14 and that is what the new code
> is using). For SB700/SB800 PCI config 70h is reserved ("software
> should not write to it") and that is why I wanted to avoid accesses to
> that register. (See SB700 documentation
> http://support.amd.com/us/Embedded_TechDocs/43009_sb7xx_rrg_pub_1.00.pdf)
>
> So the right thing to do is to correct the check for SB600 to cover
> all SB600 revisions w/o depending on the setting of bit 8 in PCI
> config 70h.
>
> Attached patch should achieve this.
> Can you please test this patch on top of -rc7?
>
>
> Thanks a lot,
>
> Andreas
> ---
> From 8453f3aef2e2b89ba30877998dcbfc06f475e253 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>
> Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 15:16:47 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] x86, quirk: Fix SB600 revision check
>
> Commit 7f74f8f28a2bd9db9404f7d364e2097a0c42cc12
> (x86 quirk: Fix polarity for IRQ0 pin2 override on SB800 systems)
> introduced a regression. It removed some SB600 specific code
> to determine the revision ID without adapting a corresponding
> revision ID check for SB600.
>
> See this mail thread
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=129980296006380&w=2
>
> This patch adapts the corresponding check to cover all SB600
> revisions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c |    7 ++++++-
>  1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c b/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c
> index 9efbdcc..3755ef4 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c
> @@ -159,7 +159,12 @@ static void __init ati_bugs_contd(int num, int slot, int func)
>  	if (rev >= 0x40)
>  		acpi_fix_pin2_polarity = 1;
>  
> -	if (rev > 0x13)
> +	/*
> +	 * SB600: revisions 0x11, 0x12, 0x13, 0x14, ...
> +	 * SB700: revisions 0x39, 0x3a, ...
> +	 * SB800: revisions 0x40, 0x41, ...
> +	 */
> +	if (rev >= 0x39)
>  		return;
>  
>  	if (acpi_use_timer_override)

-- 
Regards,
Lei