[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110311133542.8ffb094e.sfr@au1.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 13:35:42 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@....ibm.com>
To: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the cpufreq tree with the s5p tree
Hi Dave,
Today's linux-next merge of the cpufreq tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/mach-exynos4/cpufreq.c between commit 7d30e8b3815f ("ARM:
EXYNOS4: Add EXYNOS4 CPU initialization support") from the s5p tree and
commit 44033b9c940e ([CPUFREQ] Remove the pm_message_t argument from
driver suspend"") from the cpufreq tree (where this file is called
arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/cpufreq.c).
Just context changes. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
necessary.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
diff --cc arch/arm/mach-exynos4/cpufreq.c
index a16ac35,7c08ad7..0000000
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/cpufreq.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/cpufreq.c
@@@ -452,8 -458,7 +452,7 @@@ static int exynos4_target(struct cpufre
}
#ifdef CONFIG_PM
- static int exynos4_cpufreq_suspend(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
- pm_message_t pmsg)
-static int s5pv310_cpufreq_suspend(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
++static int exynos4_cpufreq_suspend(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
return 0;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists