[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D7BBC03.3020404@garzik.org>
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 13:31:31 -0500
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: Indan Zupancic <indan@....nu>
CC: Ric Wheeler <ricwheeler@...il.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Sage Weil <sage@...dream.net>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Aneesh Kumar K. V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@...il.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
mtk.manpages@...il.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, hch@....de,
l@...per.es
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] introduce sys_syncfs to sync a single file system
On 03/11/2011 10:50 PM, Indan Zupancic wrote:
> If sync(2) didn't exist and people wanted to add it I'd complain too. This
> has all the problems of sync(2), but with the "not sure if all the files are
> on the file system I think" problem added.
You are decades too late, then...
sync_file_range() is not appropriate because that works on only one fd.
The new syscall is fine, and addresses a need.
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists