[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1299970786-8075-3-git-send-email-jolsa@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 23:59:46 +0100
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: rostedt@...dmis.org, fweisbec@...il.com, mingo@...hat.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, oleg@...hat.com,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] tracing - putting cond_resched into tace_pipe loop
Adding cond_resched call to the tracing_read_pipe while loop.
Plus check for signal to leave the loop.
This will protect us from soft lockup on NON preemptive kernels
and improve latency.
Thanks a lot to Oleg Nestorov for helping me to nail this down.
wbr,
jirka
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
---
kernel/trace/trace.c | 13 +++++++++++++
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
index 20d84f8..7d66476 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
@@ -3237,10 +3237,23 @@ waitagain:
* One of the trace_seq_* functions is not used properly.
*/
WARN_ON(iter->seq.full);
+
+ /*
+ * There's a chance this loop might get quite tight,
+ * causing latency in non preemptive kernel.
+ */
+ cond_resched();
+ if (signal_pending(current)) {
+ sret = -EINTR;
+ break;
+ }
}
trace_access_unlock(iter->cpu_file);
trace_event_read_unlock();
+ if (sret == -EINTR)
+ goto out;
+
/* Now copy what we have to the user */
sret = trace_seq_to_user(&iter->seq, ubuf, cnt);
if (iter->seq.readpos >= iter->seq.len)
--
1.7.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists