linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] vhost-net: use lock_sock_fast() in peek_head

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110313211129.GA10235@redhat.com>
Date:	Sun, 13 Mar 2011 23:11:29 +0200
From:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, virtualization@...ts.osdl.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] vhost-net: use lock_sock_fast() in peek_head_len()

On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 06:41:32PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le dimanche 13 mars 2011 à 18:43 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin a écrit :
> > On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 05:32:07PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > > Le dimanche 13 mars 2011 à 18:19 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin a écrit :
> > > 
> > > > Other side is in drivers/net/tun.c and net/packet/af_packet.c
> > > > At least wrt tun it seems clear socket is not locked.
> > > 
> > > Yes (assuming you refer to tun_net_xmit())
> > > 
> > > > Besides queue, dequeue seems to be done without socket locked.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > It seems this code (assuming you speak of drivers/vhost/net.c ?) has
> > > some races indeed.
> > > 
> > 
> > Hmm. Any more besides the one fixed here?
> > 
> 
> If writers and readers dont share a common lock, how can they reliably
> synchronize states ?

They are all supposed to use sk_receive_queue.lock I think.

> For example, the check at line 420 seems unsafe or useless.
> 
> skb_queue_empty(&sock->sk->sk_receive_queue)
> 

It's mostly useless: code that is called after this
 does skb_peek and checks the result under the spinlock.
This was supposed to be an optimization: quickly check
that queue is not empty before we bother disabling notifications
etc, but I dont' remember at this point whether it actually gives any gain.
Thanks for pointing this out, I'll take it out I think (below).
Note: there are two places of this call in upstream: handle_rx_bug and
handle_rx_mergeable, but they are merged into a single
handle_rx by a patch by Jason Wang.
The below patch is on top.
If you like to look at the latest code,
it's here master.kernel.org:/home/mst/pub/vhost.git
branch vhost-net-next has it all.

Eric, thanks very much for pointing out these.
Is there anything else that you see in this driver?


Thanks!


    vhost-net: remove unlocked use of receive_queue
    
    Use of skb_queue_empty(&sock->sk->sk_receive_queue)
    without taking the sk_receive_queue.lock is unsafe
    or useless. Take it out.
    
    Reported-by:  Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
    Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>

diff --git a/drivers/vhost/net.c b/drivers/vhost/net.c
index 5720301..2f7c76a 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/net.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/net.c
@@ -311,7 +311,7 @@ static void handle_rx(struct vhost_net *net)
 	/* TODO: check that we are running from vhost_worker? */
 	struct socket *sock = rcu_dereference_check(vq->private_data, 1);
 
-	if (!sock || skb_queue_empty(&sock->sk->sk_receive_queue))
+	if (!sock)
 		return;
 
 	mutex_lock(&vq->mutex);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/