[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=3AiLaw5Gnis8Ha4eRXirk0s-Cnk2zzN12YDpH@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 12:50:44 +0200
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...ell.com>,
"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>, binutils@...rceware.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Alan Modra <amodra@...il.com>
Subject: Re: PATCH: Add --size-check=[error|warning]
Hi Alan,
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Alan Modra <amodra@...il.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 10:55:34AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> The thing is, it is absolutely, breath-takingy incompetent for
>
> kernel developers to write such poor asm! And not notice the error
> for 4 years! Oh, and the binutils developers to write such a poor
> assembler in the first place. ;-)
>
> Seriously, you are complaining because something is fixed??
>
>> The correct solution is to turn it into a warning as me and others have suggested.
>
> I disagree. The whole world is not the linux kernel. I think HJ is
> bending over backwards to even offer a switch that turns the error
> into a warning.
So what do you suggest that testers who want to, say, build old Linux
kernel versions with new binutils do?
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists