[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <FB72B156-6DF9-413B-98F2-D23A449E9303@mit.edu>
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 21:37:44 -0400
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....EDU>
To: "Indan Zupancic" <indan@....nu>
Cc: "Jeff Garzik" <jeff@...zik.org>,
"Ric Wheeler" <ricwheeler@...il.com>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>, "Sage Weil" <sage@...dream.net>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Aneesh Kumar K. V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Jonathan Nieder" <jrnieder@...il.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, mtk.manpages@...il.com,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, hch@....de, l@...per.es
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] introduce sys_syncfs to sync a single file system
On Mar 13, 2011, at 9:31 PM, Indan Zupancic wrote:
> The new syscall works on only one fd too. The behaviour of the proposed
> syncfs and an extended sync_file_range is exactly the same.
No, it's quite different. One syncs the entire file system; sync_file_range
requests that the pages associated with a file be pushed to disk --- it says
nothing about the metadata associated with the file.
I'm in favor of the new sys_syncfs system call.
-- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists