lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110314145808.GA28480@lst.de>
Date:	Mon, 14 Mar 2011 15:58:08 +0100
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:	"Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
Cc:	linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
	FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
	Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>,
	Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@...erlog.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/21] tcm_loop: Add multi-fabric Linux/SCSI LLD fabric
	module

On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 04:06:15AM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
>  drivers/target/Kconfig                         |    2 +
>  drivers/target/Makefile                        |    3 +
>  drivers/target/tcm_loop/Kconfig                |   11 +
>  drivers/target/tcm_loop/Makefile               |    5 +
>  drivers/target/tcm_loop/tcm_loop_configfs.c    |  643 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/target/tcm_loop/tcm_loop_core.h        |  141 ++++++
>  drivers/target/tcm_loop/tcm_loop_fabric.c      |  472 +++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/target/tcm_loop/tcm_loop_fabric_scsi.c |  574 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  8 files changed, 1851 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

Please descide on a naming scheme for the frontend modules.  You have
tcm_loop for thise one, and just iscsi for the iscsi frontend.  I'm
not sure what tcm actually stands for, but a common prefix defintively
is helpful.

And for only about 1700 lines of code I really don't see why it needs to be
split into multiple implementation files.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ