[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110314154756.GG31340@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 08:47:56 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Tim Hockin <thockin@...gle.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...nel.org>,
Mike Waychison <mikew@...gle.com>,
Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@...l.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@...gle.com>,
Aaron Durbin <adurbin@...gle.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, San Mehat <san@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 12/12] driver: Google Memory Console
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 03:23:15PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Tim Hockin <thockin@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> > This same BIOS logic is used across a number of Platforms. We could
> > use something like the vendor strings to trigger this code off, [...]
>
> Correct.
>
> > [...] I suppose, but ick. It's already in a google/ subdir and wrapped with
> > CONFIG_GOOGLE_MEMCONSOLE.
>
> That's not the point though - in this day and age we simply do not add non-generic
> hacks like that - we've come a long way since the ISA days. The point is to make it
> safe enough to limit its effects not just to CONFIG_GOOGLE_MEMCONSOLE but also to
> affected hardware only.
I strongly agree, we can't take this as-is without this type of code
added to the driver, sorry.
Thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists