[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m2k4g1zdmt.fsf@firstfloor.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 12:49:14 -0700
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip:x86/mm 1/3] x86: A fast way to check capabilities of the current cpu
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> writes:
> Add this_cpu_has() which determines if the current cpu has a certain
> ability using a segment prefix and a bit test operation.
Hmm: if the CPU capability is really tested in a performance critical
path, wouldn't it even be better to just use static_branch() now?
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists