[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110314222229.GJ25442@fieldses.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 18:22:29 -0400
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
To: Mi Jinlong <mijinlong@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: roel <roel.kluin@...il.com>, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfsd: wrong index used in inner loop
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 12:13:55PM +0800, Mi Jinlong wrote:
>
>
> J. Bruce Fields:
> > On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 10:32:26PM +0100, roel wrote:
> >> Index i was already used in the outer loop
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>
> >> ---
> >> fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c | 4 ++--
> >> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> Not 100% sure this one is needed but it looks suspicious.
> >
> > Looks bad to me, thanks.
> >
> > nfsd4_decode_create_session should probably really be broken up a little
> > bit; if it wasn't so long this would have been more obvious.
> >
> > I'll see if I can slip this into 2.6.38 with a couple other last-minute
> > patches.... Otherwise, it'll be in 2.6.39.
> >
> > --b.
> >
> >> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
> >> index 1275b86..615f0a9 100644
> >> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
> >> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
> >> @@ -1142,7 +1142,7 @@ nfsd4_decode_create_session(struct nfsd4_compoundargs *argp,
> >>
> >> u32 dummy;
> >> char *machine_name;
> >> - int i;
> >> + int i, j;
> >> int nr_secflavs;
> >>
> >> READ_BUF(16);
> >> @@ -1215,7 +1215,7 @@ nfsd4_decode_create_session(struct nfsd4_compoundargs *argp,
> >> READ_BUF(4);
> >> READ32(dummy);
> >> READ_BUF(dummy * 4);
> >> - for (i = 0; i < dummy; ++i)
> >> + for (j = 0; j < dummy; ++j)
> >> READ32(dummy);
>
> We must not use dummy for index here.
> After the first index, READ32(dummy) will change dummy!!!!
Actually, wait, this is kind of silly. I don't see why we couldn't just
skip the loop and do
p += dummy;
Also, your new test is still failing with a BAD_XDR error. Well, maybe
the test should fail--we don't really implement this yet anyway--but it
should at least be getting past the xdr decoding. So something else is
still wrong.
--b.
>
> The following patch fix this problem.
>
> --
> thanks,
> Mi Jinlong
> ============================================================
>
> We must not use dummy for index.
> After the first index, READ32(dummy) will change dummy!!!!
>
> Signed-off-by: Mi Jinlong <mijinlong@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
> fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
> index 615f0a9..8dd70d0 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
> @@ -1140,7 +1140,7 @@ nfsd4_decode_create_session(struct nfsd4_compoundargs *argp,
> {
> DECODE_HEAD;
>
> - u32 dummy;
> + u32 dummy, tmp;
> char *machine_name;
> int i, j;
> int nr_secflavs;
> @@ -1216,7 +1216,7 @@ nfsd4_decode_create_session(struct nfsd4_compoundargs *argp,
> READ32(dummy);
> READ_BUF(dummy * 4);
> for (j = 0; j < dummy; ++j)
> - READ32(dummy);
> + READ32(tmp);
> break;
> case RPC_AUTH_GSS:
> dprintk("RPC_AUTH_GSS callback secflavor "
> --
> 1.7.4.1
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists