linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][rfc] Use int as return type of main in arch/x86/boot/main.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1103150034310.26293@swampdragon.chaosbits.net>
Date:	Tue, 15 Mar 2011 00:35:02 +0100 (CET)
From:	Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, greg@...ah.com,
	joe@...ches.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][rfc] Use int as return type of main in
 arch/x86/boot/main.c

On Mon, 14 Mar 2011, H. Peter Anvin wrote:

> On 03/14/2011 04:32 AM, Harry Wei wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 11:00:09PM +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> >> I believe the return type of main should always be 'int'.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
> > Acked-by: Harry Wei <harryxiyou@...il.com>
> 
> It would make more sense to rename the function to something other than
> main().
> 
Right. That's probably a better aproach. Thanks.

-- 
Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>            http://www.chaosbits.net/
Plain text mails only, please.
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/