linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (block tree related)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110314083322.GA11932@barkeeper1-xen.linbit>
Date:	Mon, 14 Mar 2011 09:33:22 +0100
From:	Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@...bit.com>
To:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@...bit.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (block
 tree  related)

On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 08:12:38AM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 2011-03-11 07:58, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > allyesconfig) failed like this:
> > 
> > drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c:96: warning: 'is_itpm' defined but not used
> > drivers/block/drbd/drbd_bitmap.c: In function '__bm_change_bits_to':
> > drivers/block/drbd/drbd_bitmap.c:1287: error: implicit declaration of function 'generic___test_and_set_le_bit'
> > drivers/block/drbd/drbd_bitmap.c:1289: error: implicit declaration of function 'generic___test_and_clear_le_bit'
> > drivers/block/drbd/drbd_bitmap.c: In function 'drbd_bm_test_bit':
> > drivers/block/drbd/drbd_bitmap.c:1438: error: implicit declaration of function 'generic_test_le_bit'
> > 
> > Caused by commit 4b0715f09655 ("drbd: allow petabyte storage on 64bit
> > arch").
> > 
> > I have applied this patch for today (surely there is a better way):
> 
> Thanks for not dropping it, I'll let the drbd guys send in a proper fix
> and get it committed.

Should that be fixed by adding
#include <asm-generic/bitops/le.h>
to 
arch/powerpc/include/asm/bitops.h
(and arch/s390/include/asm/bitops.h, possibly others?)

Or are we expected to include that ourselves, directly?

We probably need to select CONFIG_GENERIC_FIND_NEXT_BIT
from our Kconfig as well?

	Lars
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/