[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <BA67B1FD-F3B2-463E-9E09-FAAB01BFE479@mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 06:22:44 -0400
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....EDU>
To: Indan Zupancic <indan@....nu>
Cc: "Sage Weil" <sage@...dream.net>, "Greg KH" <greg@...ah.com>,
"Jonathan Nieder" <jrnieder@...il.com>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Aneesh Kumar K. V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
mtk.manpages@...il.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, hch@....de,
l@...per.es
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] introduce sys_syncfs to sync a single file system
On Mar 14, 2011, at 5:27 AM, Indan Zupancic wrote:
>
> Your new syncfs also operates on files, it's only the name of sync_file_range
> which is not very fitting. Other than that, syncing files in weird, nonstandard
> ways is what it does and in that sense it's a good place for syncfs functionality.
It operates on a file system. It takes a file descriptor as an argument. (Much
like the statfs(2) system call.) There's a difference.
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists