[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <y0maagxuqx6.fsf@fche.csb>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 21:13:25 -0400
From: fche@...hat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler)
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
int-list-linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
SystemTap <systemtap@...rces.redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2.6.38-rc8-tip 0/20] 0: Inode based uprobes
akpm wrote:
> [...] How do you envisage these features actually get used?
Patch #20/20 in the set includes an ftrace-flavoured debugfs frontend.
Previous versions of the patchset included perf front-ends too, which
are probably to be seen again.
> For example, will gdb be modified? Will other debuggers be modified
> or written? [...]
The code is not currently useful to gdb. Perhaps ptrace or an
improved userspace ABI can get access to it in the form of a
breakpoint-management interface, though this inode+offset
style of uprobe addressing would require adaptation to the
process-virtual-address style used by debugging APIs.
- FChE
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists