[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201103151359.12569.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 13:59:12 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andy Adamson <andros@...app.com>,
Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>,
Dean Hildebrand <dhildeb@...ibm.com>,
Fred Isaman <iisaman@...i.umich.edu>,
Mike Sager <sager@...app.com>,
Fred Isaman <iisaman@...app.com>,
Mingyang Guo <guomingyang@...hpc.ac.cn>,
Ricardo Labiaga <Ricardo.Labiaga@...app.com>,
Tao Guo <guotao@...hpc.ac.cn>,
Benny Halevy <bhalevy@...asas.com>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the bkl-config tree
On Tuesday 15 March 2011, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> After merging the bkl-config tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> fs/nfs/read.c:21:28: error: linux/smp_lock.h: No such file or directory
>
> Caused by commit 64419a9b2093 ("NFSv4.1: generic read") from the nfs tree
> interacting with commit 4ba8216cd905 ("BKL: That's all, folks") from the
> bkl-config tree.
>
> I couldn't see that this include file was needed, so I applied the patch
> below (which Trond could apply to his tree, I am pretty sure). (I am not
> sure why module.h is included either.)
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 18:37:09 +1100
> Subject: [PATCH] nfs: BKL is no longer needed, so remove the include
>
The fix is good. I have one patch in bkl-config that removes all instances
of #include <linux/smp_lock.h> treewide. Obviously that doesn't
help where new ones creep in, so we have to eliminate them one
by one.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists