[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1300196879.9910.271.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 09:47:59 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Stephen Wilson <wilsons@...rt.ca>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...k.frob.com>,
SystemTap <systemtap@...rces.redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2.6.38-rc8-tip 7/20] 7: uprobes: store/restore
original instruction.
On Tue, 2011-03-15 at 14:52 +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> * Stephen Wilson <wilsons@...rt.ca> [2011-03-14 14:09:14]:
>
Nitpick:
> Guess checking for tsk != NULL would only help if and only if we are doing
> within rcu. i.e we have to change to something like this
>
tsk = NULL;
> rcu_read_lock()
> if (mm->owner) {
> get_task_struct(mm->owner)
> tsk = mm->owner;
> }
> rcu_read_unlock()
> if (!tsk)
> return ret;
>
> Agree?
Or:
rcu_read_lock();
tsk = mm->owner;
if (tsk)
get_task_struct(tsk);
rcu_read_unlock();
if (!tsk)
return ret;
Probably looks cleaner.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists