[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1300155965.5665.15.camel@mulgrave.site>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 22:26:05 -0400
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>
To: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
acpi4asus-user@...ts.sourceforge.net, rtc-linux@...glegroups.com,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, open-iscsi@...glegroups.com,
security@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/20] world-writable files in sysfs and debugfs
On Sat, 2011-03-12 at 23:23 +0300, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote:
> > Vasiliy Kulikov (20):
> > mach-ux500: mbox-db5500: world-writable sysfs fifo file
> > leds: lp5521: world-writable sysfs engine* files
> > leds: lp5523: world-writable engine* sysfs files
> > misc: ep93xx_pwm: world-writable sysfs files
> > rtc: rtc-ds1511: world-writable sysfs nvram file
> > scsi: aic94xx: world-writable sysfs update_bios file
> > scsi: iscsi: world-writable sysfs priv_sess file
>
> These are still not merged :(
OK, so I've not been tracking where we are in the dizzying ride on
security systems. However, I thought we landed up in the privilege
separation arena using capabilities. That means that world writeable
files aren't necessarily a problem as long as the correct capabilities
checks are in place, right?
James
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists