[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110315152222.GW17108@twin.jikos.cz>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 16:22:22 +0100
From: David Sterba <dave@...os.cz>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: adilger@...ger.ca
Subject: Re: ext4 deep stack with mark_page_dirty reclaim
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 07:25:10PM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> Is there a script which you used to generate this stack trace to
> function size mapping, or did you do it by hand? I've always wanted
> such a script, but the tricky part is that there is so much garbage on
> the stack that any automated stack parsing is almost useless.
> Alternately, it would seem trivial to have the stack dumper print the
> relative address of each symbol, and the delta from the previous
> symbol...
> > 240 schedule+0x25a
> > 368 io_schedule+0x35
> > 32 get_request_wait+0xc6
from the callstack:
ffff88007a704338 schedule+0x25a
ffff88007a7044a8 io_schedule+0x35
ffff88007a7044c8 get_request_wait+0xc6
subtract the values and you get the ones Ted posted,
eg. for get_request_wait:
0xffff88007a7044c8 - 0xffff88007a7044a8 = 32
There'se a script scripts/checkstack.pl which tries to determine stack
usage from 'objdump -d' looking for the 'sub 0x123,%rsp' instruction and
reporting the 0x123 as stack consumption. It does not give same results,
for the get_request_wait:
ffffffff81216205: 48 83 ec 68 sub $0x68,%rsp
reported as 104.
dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists