[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1103151252000.558@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 12:54:47 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Andrey Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>,
Frantisek Hrbata <fhrbata@...hat.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3 for 2.6.38] oom: oom_kill_process: don't set TIF_MEMDIE
if !p->mm
On Tue, 15 Mar 2011, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Confused. I sent the test-case. OK, may be you meant the code in -mm,
> but I meant the current code.
>
This entire discussion, and your involvement in it, originated from these
two patches being merged into -mm:
oom-prevent-unnecessary-oom-kills-or-kernel-panics.patch
oom-skip-zombies-when-iterating-tasklist.patch
So naturally I'm going to challenge your testcases with the latest -mm.
If you wanted to suggest pushing these to 2.6.38 earlier, I don't think
anyone would have disputed that -- I certainly wouldn't have since the
first fixes a quite obvious panic that we've faced on a lot of our
machines. It's not that big of a deal, though, since Andrew has targeted
them for -stable and they're on schedule to be pushed to 2.6.38.x
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists