[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110315113049.a6112494.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 11:30:49 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, bhutchings@...arflare.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, hpa@...or.com,
peterz@...radead.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree
Hi Dave,
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 10:56:12 +0100 (CET) Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 14 Mar 2011, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 22:53:12 -0700 (PDT) David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> > > Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 16:31:35 +1100
> > >
> > > > Maybe some config option changed ...
> > >
> > > Perhaps GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO_DEPRECATED?
> >
> > Yep, that has been turned on for powerpc now. I guess you will have the
> > same problem on sparc64 of you merge the net-next and sparc trees ...
>
> Yeah, powerpc alone compiles with GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO_DEPRECATED as it
> does not have that notify commit.
>
> If you add net which has that notify commit, but not the fix it
> breaks. I wonder whether Dave should pick that fix into net.
So, if you merge the commit 1fb0ef31f428 ("genirq: Fix affinity notifier
fallout") from the tip tree, you will get exactly one new commit and will
fix your tree properly with no adverse effect on anyone else.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists