linux-kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTimP9-SK3YCwgsS8USEYNExFQTQLPYXKi+RUbBT4@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 16 Mar 2011 15:05:29 +0530
From:	snmp snmp <snmp.ml@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Query

Hi ,
     Me and my friends are working on a new concept.
     Idea is to run different kernels on different cores in a
multicore architecture. Each kernel is performing logically different
tasks. We believe to improve the cache performance and reduce cpu idle
time. This concept can be applied to filers , graphics processing
systems , embedded systems.
     Our implementation is on Intel core 2 duo machine. So far our
implementation includes running two kernels simultaneously (one on
each core) , handling hard-disk on one core and ethernet on another
core so as to divide the network and disk subsystem.

     But here we are unable to measure the performance. Can u please
suggest any method to measure the performance in terms of throughput
and response time?

     Thank you.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/