linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (jdelvare-hwmon tree related)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110316123030.68bdbdcb@endymion.delvare>
Date:	Wed, 16 Mar 2011 12:30:30 +0100
From:	Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree 
 (jdelvare-hwmon  tree related)

On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 21:22:26 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Jean,
> 
> On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 10:32:28 +0100 Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org> wrote:
> >
> > Stephen, sorry for the inconvenience, both Hans and myself build-tested
> > the new code on an architecture where <linux/delay.h> gets included
> > implicitly, so we didn't notice it was missing.
> 
> It happens.  It seems that delay.h is almost always the one that is
> forgotten.  X86 builds include it implicitly but powerpc doesn't.
> 
> I wonder if we could concoct a nice checkpatch test for it.

Would certainly be a good idea, yes. Probably not trivial though.

-- 
Jean Delvare
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/