[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m3lj0f2cq1.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 11:32:06 -0600
From: Tom Tromey <tromey@...hat.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...k.frob.com>,
SystemTap <systemtap@...rces.redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2.6.38-rc8-tip 0/20] 0: Inode based uprobes
Steve> I'm more interested in the perf/trace than gdb, as the way gdb is mostly
Steve> used (at least now) to debug problems in the code with a big hammer
Steve> (single step, look at registers/variables). That is, gdb is usually very
Steve> interactive and its best to "stop the code" from running to examine what
Steve> has happened. gdb is not something you will run on an application that
Steve> is being used by others.
It depends. People do in fact do this stuff. In recent years gdb got
its own implementation of "always inserted" breakpoints (basically the
same idea as uprobes) to support some trickier multi-thread debugging
scenarios.
Tom
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists