[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <e119fbd060c9452c56063ea6148ba1070e7434cc.1300299760.git.jbaron@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 15:58:27 -0400
From: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
To: rostedt@...dmis.org
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, hpa@...or.com, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de, andi@...stfloor.org,
roland@...hat.com, rth@...hat.com, masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, avi@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net,
sam@...nborg.org, ddaney@...iumnetworks.com,
michael@...erman.id.au, ralf@...ux-mips.org,
jang@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] jump label: add _ASM_ALIGN for x86 and x86_64
The linker should not be adding holes to word size aligned pointers, but
out of paranoia we are explicitly specifying that alignment. I have not
seen any holes in the jump label section in practice.
Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/jump_label.h | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/jump_label.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/jump_label.h
index f217cee..a32b18c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/jump_label.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/jump_label.h
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ static __always_inline bool arch_static_branch(struct jump_label_key *key)
asm goto("1:"
JUMP_LABEL_INITIAL_NOP
".pushsection __jump_table, \"aw\" \n\t"
+ _ASM_ALIGN "\n\t"
_ASM_PTR "1b, %l[l_yes], %c0 \n\t"
".popsection \n\t"
: : "i" (key) : : l_yes);
--
1.7.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists