linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/8] mm/slub: Add SLUB

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 15 Mar 2011 21:57:18 -0500
From:	Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
To:	George Spelvin <linux@...izon.com>
Cc:	penberg@...helsinki.fi, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] mm/slub: Add SLUB_RANDOMIZE support

On Sun, 2011-03-13 at 20:20 -0400, George Spelvin wrote:
> As a followup to the "[PATCH] Make /proc/slabinfo 0400" thread, this
> is a patch series to randomize the order of object allocations within
> a page.  It can be extended to SLAB and SLOB if desired.  Mostly it's
> for benchmarking and discussion.

I've spent a while thinking about this over the past few weeks, and I
really don't think it's productive to try to randomize the allocators.
It provides negligible defense and just makes life harder for kernel
hackers.

(And you definitely can't randomize SLOB like this.)

> Patches 1-4 and 8 touch drivers/char/random.c, to add support for
> efficiently generating a series of uniform random integers in small
> ranges.  Is this okay with Herbert & Matt?

But I will look at these.

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/