[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87y64fhfjw.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:39:39 +1030
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, qemu-devel@...gnu.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: stefanha@...il.com, kwolf@...hat.com, prerna@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
aliguori@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] virtio_blk: add cache control support
On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:16:44 +0100, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
> Add support for the new dynamic features config space field to allow
> en/disabling the write cache at runtime. The userspace interface is
> a SCSI-compatible sysfs attribute.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Hi Christoph,
Neat work. Minor comments:
> + if (strncmp(buf, "write through", sizeof("write through") - 1) == 0) {
> + ;
> + } else if (strncmp(buf, "write back", sizeof("write back") - 1) == 0) {
Is there a reason we're not letting gcc and/or strcmp do the
optimization work here?
> + vdev->config->set(vdev, offsetof(struct virtio_blk_config, features),
> + &features, sizeof(features));
> +
> + vdev->config->get(vdev, offsetof(struct virtio_blk_config, features),
> + &features2, sizeof(features2));
> +
> + if ((features & VIRTIO_BLK_RT_WCE) !=
> + (features2 & VIRTIO_BLK_RT_WCE))
> + return -EIO;
This seems like a debugging check you left in. Or do you suspect
some issues?
Thanks,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists