[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87sjumrvzk.fsf@lebrac.rtp-net.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 09:29:03 +0100
From: Arnaud Patard (Rtp) <arnaud.patard@...-net.org>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Dinh.Nguyen@...escale.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux@....linux.org.uk,
u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de, ra5478@...escale.com,
xiao-lizhang@...escale.com, festevam@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 3/3] ARM: mx51: Add support for low power suspend on MX51
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de> writes:
Hi,
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 03:03:07PM -0500, Dinh.Nguyen@...escale.com wrote:
>> +
>> +struct clk *gpc_dvfs_clk;
>> +
>> +static int mx5_suspend_enter(suspend_state_t state)
>> +{
>> + if (gpc_dvfs_clk == NULL)
>> + gpc_dvfs_clk = clk_get(NULL, "gpc_dvfs_clk");
>
> clk_get can fail and NULL can be a valid clock.
So, I guess one may want to fail here if one can't get the clock. The
suspend will fail in hard to debug way if this clock is not enabled
at this point.
Arnaud
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists