[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201103170446.12011.vapier@gentoo.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 04:46:11 -0400
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x32-abi@...glegroups.com
Subject: X32 syscall number base
in looking at how syscalls are implemented, i see that you've picked a base of
4096. so syscall numbers [0...4096) are for x86_64 and [4096...-1) are for
x32. this 4096 limit is a bit low isnt it ? seems like the best bet would be
to bisect the available space for each new ABI ...
ARM EABI picked 0x900000 for their base when adding a new ABI ...
-mike
Download attachment "signature.asc " of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists