[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D81DFA4.7000204@kernel.dk>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 11:17:08 +0100
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@...bit.com>,
Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@...bit.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (block
tree related)
On 2011-03-17 00:31, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Jens,
>
> On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 08:12:38 +0100 Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> wrote:
>>
>> On 2011-03-11 07:58, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>
>>> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
>>> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>>>
>>> drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c:96: warning: 'is_itpm' defined but not used
>>> drivers/block/drbd/drbd_bitmap.c: In function '__bm_change_bits_to':
>>> drivers/block/drbd/drbd_bitmap.c:1287: error: implicit declaration of function 'generic___test_and_set_le_bit'
>>> drivers/block/drbd/drbd_bitmap.c:1289: error: implicit declaration of function 'generic___test_and_clear_le_bit'
>>> drivers/block/drbd/drbd_bitmap.c: In function 'drbd_bm_test_bit':
>>> drivers/block/drbd/drbd_bitmap.c:1438: error: implicit declaration of function 'generic_test_le_bit'
>>>
>>> Caused by commit 4b0715f09655 ("drbd: allow petabyte storage on 64bit
>>> arch").
>>>
>>> I have applied this patch for today (surely there is a better way):
>>
>> Thanks for not dropping it, I'll let the drbd guys send in a proper fix
>> and get it committed.
>
> Ping?
Lars, please send me a fix for this ASAP. It's holding up the block
merge.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists