[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <99B09243E1A5DA4898CDD8B70011144810830AB18B@EXMB04.eu.tieto.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 15:38:07 +0200
From: <Waldemar.Rymarkiewicz@...to.com>
To: <arnd@...db.de>
CC: <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] NFC: Driver for Inside Secure MicroRead NFC chip
Arnd,
>An application can open the device, and then do a
>pthread_create() or a fork(). In either case, you have two
>concurrent threads that have access to the file pointer and
>can read from it concurrently, which is inherently racy
>regarding which of the processes gets the data.
In that case I would relay on the application to synchronise the access.
>This is not very different from opening the file descriptor in
>multiple processes, which you prevent using your logic.
but in the case when two independent applications try to open my device I can't let the second to access. They obviously won't synch the access.
>You can of course argue that you try your best to prevent the
>race. Traditionally, e.g. on serial ports and the like, we
>don't do this but instead rely on user space synchronizing the
>access. What you have to make sure of course is that multiple
>threads calling read on the same file can never bring the
>kernel driver into an invalid state.
I assume, if an application shares the file pointer deliberately it have to sync the access. In other cases, the driver needs to secure it.
Waldek--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists