lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56132A77AB93C141BF06E6B96CA6CFEA1B7F51@039-SN1MPN1-004.039d.mgd.msft.net>
Date:	Thu, 17 Mar 2011 16:52:44 +0000
From:	Nguyen Dinh-R00091 <R00091@...escale.com>
To:	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux@....linux.org.uk" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	"u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de" <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
	"arnaud.patard@...-net.org" <arnaud.patard@...-net.org>,
	Vaidyanathan Ranjani-RA5478 <RA5478@...escale.com>,
	Zhang Lily-R58066 <R58066@...escale.com>,
	"festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCHv3 2/3] ARM: mx51: Implement code to allow mx51 to enter
 WFI

Hi Sascha,


>-----Original Message-----
>From: Sascha Hauer [mailto:s.hauer@...gutronix.de]
>Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 3:19 AM
>To: Nguyen Dinh-R00091
>Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org; linux@....linux.org.uk;
>u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de; arnaud.patard@...-net.org; Vaidyanathan Ranjani-RA5478; Zhang Lily-
>R58066; festevam@...il.com
>Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 2/3] ARM: mx51: Implement code to allow mx51 to enter WFI
>
>On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 03:03:06PM -0500, Dinh.Nguyen@...escale.com wrote:
>> From: Dinh Nguyen <Dinh.Nguyen@...escale.com>
>>
>> Implement code for MX51 that allows the SoC to enter WFI when
>> arch_idle is called.
>>
>> This patch is also necessary for correctly suspending the system.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dinh Nguyen <Dinh.Nguyen@...escale.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/mach-mx5/Makefile              |    2 +-
>>  arch/arm/mach-mx5/system.c              |   84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/mxc.h    |    9 +++
>>  arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/system.h |    6 ++-
>>  4 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-mx5/system.c
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/Makefile b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/Makefile
>> index 4f63048..0b9338c 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/Makefile
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/Makefile
>> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
>>  #
>>
>>  # Object file lists.
>> -obj-y   := cpu.o mm.o clock-mx51-mx53.o devices.o ehci.o
>> +obj-y   := cpu.o mm.o clock-mx51-mx53.o devices.o ehci.o system.o
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_IMX50) += mm-mx50.o
>>
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_IMX)    += cpu_op-mx51.o
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/system.c b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/system.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..c4e9e00
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/system.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (C) 2011 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
>> + */
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * The code contained herein is licensed under the GNU General Public
>> + * License. You may obtain a copy of the GNU General Public License
>> + * Version 2 or later at the following locations:
>> + *
>> + * http://www.opensource.org/licenses/gpl-license.html
>> + * http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html
>> + */
>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> +#include <asm/io.h>
>> +#include <mach/hardware.h>
>> +#include "crm_regs.h"
>> +
>> +/* set cpu low power mode before WFI instruction. This function is called
>> +  * mx5 because it can be used for mx50, mx51, and mx53.*/
>> +void mx5_cpu_lp_set(enum mxc_cpu_pwr_mode mode)
>> +{
>> +	u32 plat_lpc, arm_srpgcr, ccm_clpcr;
>> +	u32 empgc0, empgc1;
>> +	int stop_mode = 0;
>> +
>> +	/* always allow platform to issue a deep sleep mode request */
>> +	plat_lpc = __raw_readl(MXC_CORTEXA8_PLAT_LPC) &
>> +	    ~(MXC_CORTEXA8_PLAT_LPC_DSM);
>> +	ccm_clpcr = __raw_readl(MXC_CCM_CLPCR) & ~(MXC_CCM_CLPCR_LPM_MASK);
>> +	arm_srpgcr = __raw_readl(MXC_SRPG_ARM_SRPGCR) & ~(MXC_SRPGCR_PCR);
>> +	empgc0 = __raw_readl(MXC_SRPG_EMPGC0_SRPGCR) & ~(MXC_SRPGCR_PCR);
>> +	empgc1 = __raw_readl(MXC_SRPG_EMPGC1_SRPGCR) & ~(MXC_SRPGCR_PCR);
>
>You read empgc0/1 and mask the MXC_SRPGCR_PCR bit...
>
>> +
>> +	switch (mode) {
>> +	case WAIT_CLOCKED:
>> +		break;
>> +	case WAIT_UNCLOCKED:
>> +		ccm_clpcr |= 0x1 << MXC_CCM_CLPCR_LPM_OFFSET;
>> +		break;
>> +	case WAIT_UNCLOCKED_POWER_OFF:
>> +	case STOP_POWER_OFF:
>> +		plat_lpc |= MXC_CORTEXA8_PLAT_LPC_DSM
>> +			    | MXC_CORTEXA8_PLAT_LPC_DBG_DSM;
>> +		if (mode == WAIT_UNCLOCKED_POWER_OFF) {
>> +			ccm_clpcr |= 0x1 << MXC_CCM_CLPCR_LPM_OFFSET;
>> +			ccm_clpcr &= ~MXC_CCM_CLPCR_VSTBY;
>> +			ccm_clpcr &= ~MXC_CCM_CLPCR_SBYOS;
>> +			stop_mode = 0;
>> +		} else {
>> +			ccm_clpcr |= 0x2 << MXC_CCM_CLPCR_LPM_OFFSET;
>> +			ccm_clpcr |= 0x3 << MXC_CCM_CLPCR_STBY_COUNT_OFFSET;
>> +			ccm_clpcr |= MXC_CCM_CLPCR_VSTBY;
>> +			ccm_clpcr |= MXC_CCM_CLPCR_SBYOS;
>> +			stop_mode = 1;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		arm_srpgcr |= MXC_SRPGCR_PCR;
>> +		if (stop_mode) {
>> +			empgc0 |= MXC_SRPGCR_PCR;
>> +			empgc1 |= MXC_SRPGCR_PCR;
>
>... Then in stop_mode you set the bit ...
>
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		if (tzic_enable_wake(1) != 0)
>> +			return;
>> +		break;
>> +	case STOP_POWER_ON:
>> +		ccm_clpcr |= 0x2 << MXC_CCM_CLPCR_LPM_OFFSET;
>> +		break;
>> +	default:
>> +		printk(KERN_WARNING "UNKNOWN cpu power mode: %d\n", mode);
>> +		return;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	__raw_writel(plat_lpc, MXC_CORTEXA8_PLAT_LPC);
>> +	__raw_writel(ccm_clpcr, MXC_CCM_CLPCR);
>> +	__raw_writel(arm_srpgcr, MXC_SRPG_ARM_SRPGCR);
>> +	/* Enable NEON SRPG for all but MX50TO1.0. */
>> +	__raw_writel(arm_srpgcr, MXC_SRPG_NEON_SRPGCR);
>> +	if (stop_mode) {
>> +		__raw_writel(empgc0, MXC_SRPG_EMPGC0_SRPGCR);
>> +		__raw_writel(empgc1, MXC_SRPG_EMPGC1_SRPGCR);
>
>... and only in stop mode you write the value back. Can't we do the
>empgc0 handling here completely to make the code more clean?
>
>Also, I'm missing the implementation of 'all but MX50TO1.0'.
>
>> +	}
>> +}
>> +
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/mxc.h b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/mxc.h
>> index 7e07263..6c2a371 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/mxc.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/mxc.h
>> @@ -181,6 +181,15 @@ struct cpu_op {
>>  	u32 cpu_rate;
>>  };
>>
>> +int tzic_enable_wake(int is_idle);
>> +enum mxc_cpu_pwr_mode {
>> +	WAIT_CLOCKED,		/* wfi only */
>> +	WAIT_UNCLOCKED,		/* WAIT */
>> +	WAIT_UNCLOCKED_POWER_OFF,	/* WAIT + SRPG */
>> +	STOP_POWER_ON,		/* just STOP */
>> +	STOP_POWER_OFF,		/* STOP + SRPG */
>> +};
>> +
>>  extern struct cpu_op *(*get_cpu_op)(int *op);
>>  #endif
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/system.h b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/system.h
>> index 95be51b..0417da9 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/system.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/system.h
>> @@ -20,6 +20,8 @@
>>  #include <mach/hardware.h>
>>  #include <mach/common.h>
>>
>> +extern void mx5_cpu_lp_set(enum mxc_cpu_pwr_mode mode);
>> +
>>  static inline void arch_idle(void)
>>  {
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_MXC91231
>> @@ -54,7 +56,9 @@ static inline void arch_idle(void)
>>  			"orr %0, %0, #0x00000004\n"
>>  			"mcr p15, 0, %0, c1, c0, 0\n"
>>  			: "=r" (reg));
>> -	} else
>> +	} else if (cpu_is_mx51())
>> +		mx5_cpu_lp_set(WAIT_UNCLOCKED_POWER_OFF);
>> +	else
>
>Have you tried compiling this on !i.MX5 systems?

Yes, I have and its build fine for mx3_defconfig. I did find a build issue with mx27_defconfig, but it's not related to this patch:

In file included from arch/arm/mm/init.c:27:
/arm/include/asm/tlb.h: In function 'tlb_flush_mmu':
arch/arm/include/asm/tlb.h:104: error: implicit declaration of function 'release_pages'
arch/arm/include/asm/tlb.h: In function 'tlb_remove_page':
arch/arm/include/asm/tlb.h:168: error: implicit declaration of function 'page_cache_release'
make[1]: *** [arch/arm/mm/init.o] Error 1
make: *** [arch/arm/mm] Error 2

Thanks for the review, v4 is on its way.

Dinh
>
>Sascha
>
>--
>Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
>Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
>Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
>Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ