[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110317112218.563a5f21@queued.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 11:22:18 -0700
From: Andres Salomon <dilinger@...ued.net>
To: Ed W <lists@...dgooses.com>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>, rpurdie@...ys.net,
linux-geode@...ts.infradead.org, const@...as.ru,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Feedback please: [PATCH] leds: New PCEngines Alix LED driver
using gpio interface
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 17:59:06 +0000
Ed W <lists@...dgooses.com> wrote:
> On 17/03/2011 17:52, Andres Salomon wrote:
> > OLPC stuff lives in arch/x86/platform/olpc; if there was more
> > alix-specific stuff, I'd suggest moving it into something similar.
> > However, I didn't find any. Maybe an arch/x86/platform/geode as a
> > place to collect platform drivers for the various geode-based
> > machines out there (alix, soekris, etc)? Though honestly, I'm not
> > that interested in doing the work to migrate stuff over to there.
>
>
> As this is my first stab at this, I think you are agreeing that the
> current change is ok as a first step at least? (I can have a go at a
> larger code re-org later...)
Yes.
>
> Can I get your final opinion on what should be in the code Copyright
> statement before I resubmit with the module_init change? To recap I
> don't want to alienate anyone, but the code is now based on a)
> leds-5501 and b) a patch from someone not currently credited in the
> file copyright statement? I have stated this origin in the commit
> log and noted the derivation in the code itself. What to do..?
alix_present came from commit
ec9a943ce9f6d6a8ea09587b49d29a020c418c76 , which was from Constantin.
As such, it's probably not a good idea to remove the copyright notice.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists