I don't have the specs for this beast, but it looks a lot like the PXA GPIO block. Though I bet it's the same IP and the driver should have reused the PXA code. Acknowleding the edge detect status after handling one or more gpio interrupts looks wrong. We might lose an edge which came in while we handled the previous one. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Feng Tang Cc: Alek Du Cc: Alan Cox --- drivers/gpio/langwell_gpio.c | 13 ++++++------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) Index: linux-2.6-tip/drivers/gpio/langwell_gpio.c =================================================================== --- linux-2.6-tip.orig/drivers/gpio/langwell_gpio.c +++ linux-2.6-tip/drivers/gpio/langwell_gpio.c @@ -190,23 +190,22 @@ static void lnw_irq_handler(unsigned irq struct irq_data *data = irq_desc_get_irq_data(desc); struct lnw_gpio *lnw = irq_data_get_irq_handler_data(data); struct irq_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip(data); - u32 base, gpio, gedr_v; + u32 base, gpio, mask; unsigned long pending; void __iomem *gedr; /* check GPIO controller to check which pin triggered the interrupt */ for (base = 0; base < lnw->chip.ngpio; base += 32) { gedr = gpio_reg(&lnw->chip, base, GEDR); - gedr_v = pending = readl(gedr); - if (!gedr_v) - continue; + pending = readl(gedr); while (pending) { gpio = __ffs(pending) - 1; - pending &= ~BIT(gpio); + mask = BIT(gpio); + pending &= ~mask; + /* Clear before handling so we can't lose an edge */ + writel(mask, gedr); generic_handle_irq(lnw->irq_base + base + gpio); } - /* clear the edge detect status bit */ - writel(gedr_v, gedr); } chip->irq_eoi(data); -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/