lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110317072344.GZ22723@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Thu, 17 Mar 2011 07:23:44 +0000
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	Xiaotian Feng <xtfeng@...il.com>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [git pull] mnt_devname queue

On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 01:45:33PM +0800, Xiaotian Feng wrote:

> I guess we need also switch pstore from ->get_sb() to ->mount()
> 
> fs/pstore/inode.c:253: error: unknown field ???get_sb??? specified in initializer
> fs/pstore/inode.c:253: warning: initialization makes integer from
> pointer without a cast
> fs/pstore/inode.c:253: error: initializer element is not computable at load time
> fs/pstore/inode.c:253: error: (near initialization for
> ???pstore_fs_type.fs_flags???)

Yes.  I've just looked at that thing and I see several, er, issues.

a) What the hell would you expect to happen if userland mounts it twice
and unmount the first one?  pstore_sb = NULL, pstore_mnt = NULL, AFAICS.

b) pstore_writefile() - struct file on stack?  Really?  Again, in the
scenario above, what'll happen to you if pstore_mnt gets dropped and
freed in the middle of all that?

c) in the same function:
+       memset(&f, '0', sizeof f);
Ahem...

d)
+               if (pstore_is_mounted())
+                       pstore_mkfile(PSTORE_TYPE_DMESG, psinfo->name, id,
+                                     psinfo->buf, hsize + l1_cpy + l2_cpy,
+                                     CURRENT_TIME, psinfo->erase);

And what happens if it's unmounted between the check and use?  pstore_mkfile()
pretty much starts with dereferencing pstore_sb...

e) as the matter of fact, what happens if it's unmounted in the _middle_ of
pstore_mkfile()?

f) in general it's a lousy policy to tie that kind of difference in behaviour
to "somebody has it mounted someplace at the moment", even without the races
a-la (a)...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ