[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1103180935530.2787@localhost6.localdomain6>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 09:38:56 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Abhijeet Dharmapurikar <adharmap@...eaurora.org>
cc: davidb@...eaurora.org, dwalker@...o99.com,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Bryan Huntsman <bryanh@...eaurora.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm-owner@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.intradead.org,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Linus Walleij <linux.walleij@...aro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PM8921 MFD V4 2/6] mfd: pm8xxx: Add irq support
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011, adharmap@...eaurora.org wrote:
> +static struct irq_chip pm8xxx_irq_chip = {
> + .name = "pm8xxx",
> + .irq_mask_ack = pm8xxx_irq_mask_ack,
> + .irq_unmask = pm8xxx_irq_unmask,
> + .irq_set_type = pm8xxx_irq_set_type,
> + .flags = IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND,
> +};
Ok, that looks sane now. One problem remains. You have removed the
set_wake function, which will cause the core to bail when an irq is
marked wake. So you want an set_wake() function which does nothing
else than return 0 for now. I'll have a look that we can handle that
case with a chip flag in the core.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists