[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=Zq0fiVf+GcRC8M+CPakwmEWn1rrqq_U4OehNy@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 16:44:44 +0800
From: Po-Yu Chuang <ratbert.chuang@...il.com>
To: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
Cc: Ashwin Chaugule <ashbertslists@...il.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Po-Yu Chuang <ratbert@...aday-tech.com>, tony@...mide.com,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, joe@...ches.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm: cmpxchg syscall should data abort if page not write
Dear Nicolas Pitre,
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 1:57 AM, Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Mar 2011, Ashwin Chaugule wrote:
>>
>> Just beginning to understand the subtleties involved, so please
>> correct me if I'm wrong.
>> Wont this patch also fix the problem that was brought up with futexes
>> on ARM SMP ?
>
> Nope. The code being fixed here was suptly broken so it needs fixing.
> However this code is almost never used, if at all, as it is a fall-back
> solution for when all the better alternatives are not available for some
> reasons (and I'm still wondering what those reasons are for Po-Yu Chuang
> to actually use that code). In practice this bug should have affected
> no one.
We met this problem while porting an v5 SMP processor because kernel
selects NEEDS_SYSCALL_FOR_CMPXCHG by default if CPU_32v5.
After we added our own implementation of __kuser_cmpxchg, this code
is not needed anymore. But since this is actually a bug, it is still a good
idea to submit a patch. :-)
> If you have SMP then this code is definitively not what you should be
> using.
Best regards,
Po-Yu Chuang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists