[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <74AA2E38-9C4E-45EB-B810-2B64EC731F24@moocowproductions.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 11:20:01 -0500
From: Tim Soderstrom <tim@...cowproductions.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Alan Piszcz <ap@...arrain.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@...idpixels.com>,
xfs@....sgi.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.38: XFS/USB/HW issue, or failing USB stick?
On Mar 18, 2011, at 10:59 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 18 March 2011, Tim Soderstrom wrote:
>
>>>
>>> However, after some amount of time, the errors occur below, is this USB
>>> stick failing? Since it has no SMART, is there any other way to verify
>>> the 'health' of a USB stick?
>>
>> What prompted you to go with XFS over, say, ext2? The journal will generally
>> cause quite a bit more writes onto your USB device. I use ext2 on my CF card
>> in my NAS for that reason (the spinning media is on XFS of course). I know
>> that's not an answer to your problem but thought I would add it as a suggestion :)
>
> Using ext2 on flash media instead of ext3 or other file systems is
> recommended a lot, but the situation is actually much more complex.
> In https://lwn.net/Articles/428584/, I explain how these things work
> under the cover. For a drive that can only have very few erase blocks
> open, using a journaled file system will always mean thrashing, but
> for drives with more open erase blocks, it's probably better to
> use a journal than not.
Wow that's a great article, thanks for the link!
Tim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists