linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 16/20] mn10300: switch do_timer() to xtimer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <19895.1300466141@redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 18 Mar 2011 16:35:41 +0000
From:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:	Torben Hohn <torbenh@....de>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	dhowells@...hat.com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	hch@...radead.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	johnstul@...ibm.com, yong.zhang0@...il.com,
	Koichi Yasutake <yasutake.koichi@...panasonic.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 16/20] mn10300: switch do_timer() to xtimer_update()

Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:

> > xtimer_update() properly takes the xtime_lock.
> > mn10300_last_tsc is only accessed from this function.
> 
> This patch can be dropped as that code is dead. I sent a cleanup patch
> to the mn10300 folks.

This patch seems to have gone in anyway and Thomas's cleanup patch no longer
applies; should I revert it and apply Thomas's cleanup patch?

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/