[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1300487863.22236.1289.camel@pasglop>
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 09:37:43 +1100
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: andy.green@...aro.org
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
Linux USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: Platform data for onboard USB assets
On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 23:22 +0000, Andy Green wrote:
>
> Is there actually a need for sort of not platform_data but universal
> vid_pid_specific_usb_device_option_data coming from the board
> definition
> file or bootloader for *pluggable* usb devices? udev seems to be
> well
> established doing that already in a generic, not-platform-specific
> way
> that can go in all distros and so on nicely. Maybe this is just my
> impoverished imagination and people do want, say, some kinds of USB
> mice
> to operate at higher DPI or whatever when plugged in a specific board
> because it is that board.
Except that vid/pid are the -WRONG- way to do that. Your device is
on-board, the proper way to identify it uniquely is it's topological
location, ie path of HW port numbers.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists